Tag Archive for hearing

Hearing Loss: A Double Imprisonment

Imagine having hearing problems.  Now imagine you’re in prison.  And there’s nothing to help you hear anything that’s going on.  Which excludes you from much that keeps you sane and occupied during your incarceration, like activities, religious services, and vocational and rehabilitation programs and classes. AND endangers your relationships with non-incarcerated family and friends because you can’t talk to them on the phone.

That’s what’s been happening in South Carolina–and maybe elsewhere.  The Dept. of Justice just reached an agreement with them in that the South Carolina Dept. of Corrections will now provide sign language interpreters and aids that will ensure that inmates can participate in the programs that will help rehabilitate them and get them ready for life outside.  An important addition is telecommunications services that will let them communicate with the family and friends that they’ll return to.

If these are really departments of correction rather than departments of vengeance, inmates must be given the opportunity to reform–all inmates, including the hearing impaired.

OJ Simpson and the System

I’ve been in parole hearings (a victim can bring a non-participating supportive friend).  Both times the person was denied parole, despite the victim’s urging release, the inmate’s exemplary, peaceful, productive life Inside, and a show of respect  and remorse during the proceedings.

Then I watched the OJ Simpson hearing.  He spent a lot of time doing something that isn’t supposed to happen in a parole hearing–re-litigating the case.  The premise is that the case has been heard and judged and should not be re-tried during the parole hearing.  That’s in the past.  But  the Board allowed it.

Also, he showed no remorse, accepted no guilt.  In fact, he blamed everyone else for what happened. He lied about having led a non-violent life, forgetting all of the many cases of domestic abuse, which further showed his inability to accept responsibility (normally one of the criteria for release).  And he became angry when answering one of the Board members.  Yet, the Board somehow decided that his history of abuse against women was behind him and that he was now under control of his emotions, despite his outburst against the Board.

Some argue that his sentence was too severe, in light of the sentences (and non-sentence of one) of the other men involved.  If so,  that’s another reason our penal system needs to be reformed.

But so should how parole boards function–consistently, logically, and fairly for all.